Article by Tiffany Scott QC on the case of Rotrust Nominees Ltd v Hautford Ltd

 

Tiffany Scott QC (Wilberforce)

The case of Rotrust Nominees Ltd v Hautford Ltd confirms that there is no general proposition that a landlord will be entitled to refuse consent to assign, or alter, or change the planning use of the demised premises on grounds of feared enfranchisement and the consequent loss of the landlord’s interest under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.

To download Tiffany’s article click here.

 

Leave a Reply