Speakers' Corner

Charlotte Tyfield provides practical guidance on the steps landowners can take to protect themselves from trespassers including Interim Possession Orders, High Court trespasser actions and Injunctions.

In May 2019, the requisite majority of the creditors of Debenhams Retail Ltd voted in favour of a company voluntary arrangement (“CVA”) proposed pursuant to s.1 of the Insolvency Act 1986. As has become common, the scheme of arrangement proposed by the CVA only affected the rights of landlords and rating authorities. All other creditors were to be paid in full.

John Clargo considers differing approaches in two cases in which the FTT was asked to express its views on the quantified extent of a beneficial interest under a trust of land following a determination (following a reference from the registrar) that an applicant had successfully established an entitlement to a restriction based on a beneficial interest under a trust of land and the UT’s resolution of the difference between them.

Alastair Redpath-Stevens of Hardwicke considers HHJ Huskinson’s decision in Stemp and anor v 6 Ladbroke Gardens Management Ltd. This was an appeal to the Upper Tribunal from a decision of the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property) that the Stemps should pay an administration charge in relation to costs incurred by the respondent in contemplation of proceedings under section 146 of the Law of Property Act 1925.

This article discusses how a “share” can be severed in a beneficial joint tenancy where one co-owner operates upon his own share without severing the entire beneficial joint tenancy. It considers how a beneficial joint tenancy and a tenancy in common can exist concurrently.

Joanne Wicks QC and Benjamin Faulkner of Wilberforce Chambers recently acted for the successful tenant in S Franses Ltd v The Cavendish Hotel, arguably the most important landlord and tenant case for decades. In this article, Joanne and Ben summarise the facts of this case, what it means for the operation of ground (f) and the implications of the Supreme Court’s decision on future cases.

Miriam Seitler discusses applications for interim agreements under the Electronic Communications Code and the approach taken by the tribunal in this regard in recent cases.

Camilla Lamont discusses the notices which operators and site providers can serve pursuant to the Electronic Communications Code and how to serve these.

Toby Watkin discusses the features of an agreement under the Electronic Communications Code and highlights arguments site providers can raise when negotiating with operators.

Jonathan Wills discusses consideration/compensation payable under the Electronic Communications Code and the approach taken by the tribunal in this regard in recent cases