News and Articles
-
Davies v Dennis & Others
22nd Oct 2009
Covenants restricting a nuisance or annoyance may prevent building works on an estate even where the works may have been approved by the estate’s management company.Read article -
Stoll & Atkins v Wacks Caller
21st Sep 2009
Negligence by a Solicitor is only relevant if it causes a loss.Read article -
NIRAH Holdings v Hanson Building Products & Another
11th Sep 2009
A party is bound by the terms of the agreement and cannot subsequently seek to rely on matters it has not provided for.Read article -
Clark v Lucas Solicitors LLP
31st Jul 2009
Solicitors should not give undertakings lightly.Read article -
Roundstone Nurseries Limited v Stephenson Holdings Limited
10th Jun 2009
In Roundstone Nurseries Limited v Stephenson Holdings Limited, the Court considered whether it had jurisdiction to award costs in relation to a mediation that had failed.Read article -
PLA Dilapidations Protocol supported by surveyors, but they’re still revolting
01st Jan 2009
At their recent annual conference, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) Dilapidations Forum delegates soundly rejected any suggestion that the PLA Protocol should be scrapped. Inevitably though there are calls for the detail of the document to be revised (dilapidations surveyors are nothing if not persistent when it comes to finding disagreement!).Read article -
Osibanjo v Seahive Investments Limited
21st Nov 2008
The banking of a tenant’s cheque will not always lead to a landlord losing its right to forfeit a lease.Read article -
Mortgages and problems with residential tenants' pre-mortgage tenancies
19th Aug 2008
With the surge in mortgage repossessions, and a large buy-to-let market, it is timely to revisit the issue of the priority (or otherwise) of tenants in relation to mortgagees seeking possession.Read article -
Does a failure to complete justify forfeiture of a deposit?
03rd Jul 2008
When a contract for the sale of property falls through, the normal expectation is that where the fault lies with the buyer, the deposit paid on exchange of contracts will be forfeited. However, the Court is given a wide discretion to order the return of the deposit to the buyer. The precise extent of that discretion has been tested very recently in a judgment of the High Court (Midill (97PL) Limited v Park Lane Estates Limited & Anor [2008] EWHC 18 (Ch).Read article -
Tenants' Rights of First Refusal
07th Mar 2008
Dartmouth Court Blackheath Limited v Berisworth Limited [2008] EWHC (Ch) 350Read article